The Packers made a commitment to Rodgers,
Favre did everything possible to get them to break that commitment. Why not, he has failed to make a commitment for the last few years. Now that the Packers traded
Favre the fans are torn,
Favre or Rodgers, who gives the Packers the best chance to win now? The
Favre fans will tell you that without a doubt it is
Favre, Rodgers is unproven. Exactly, how can you say without a doubt
Favre? You don't know what Rodgers can or can not do? I understand, we are talking about a future Hall of Fame Quarterback, a 3-time MVP, but what has he done lately? He didn't win the MVP in 2007, close, but close doesn't
make you the best, every year there is a second place MVP vote getter. He was 4
th in Passing in the NFL last year, not first or second, but 4
th, behind Tom Brady, Drew
Brees and Tony
Romo. Does that make him a winner? He finished one position ahead of Carson Palmer for the Bengals and by the way
Kitna was 6
th in Detroit. He had a 66.5% completion rating, Still only 4
th in the League, guess what Chad Pennington of the Jets beat him there, and Houston's Matt
Schaub was just behind him. If you look at the yards per game average,
Favre averaged out to be tied for sixth with
Brees and former backup
Hasselbeck. Ben
Roethisbeger, and Derek Anderson of Cleveland among the 5 better
QB's. During a conversation with a dear family member over the weekend, he said look at the Ratings, so today I did,
Favre had a very impressive rating of 95.7, good enough for 6
th, behind most notably
Roethlisberger of Pittsburgh and Garrard of Jacksonville.
Not being a Packer fan myself, I figured after looking at those stats, I had to be missing something. Packer Fans swear
Favre can walk on water, he has a direct line to the Football Gods, what was I missing, and what was the Packers thinking letting him go?
2006 Stats - QB Rating Brett
Favre was 25
th at 72.7 only 7
QB's worse including Vince Young of my beloved Tennessee Titans. Completion Percent - 26
th at 56%.
2005 Stats - QB Rating Brett
Favre was 31st of 34 at 70.9. Completion Percent - 13
th with 61.3%.
2004 Stats - QB Rating Brett
Favre was 10
th at 92.4. Completion Percent - 9
th with 64.1%.
I still must be missing something, Brett
Favre had great years with the Green Bay Packers. They are the years that hopefully everyone remembers because the last three aren't the types of years that would have gotten him into the Hall of Fame. For all you who think they are chew on this for a minute, in 2004
Daunte Culpepper was second in QB Rating at 110.9 with 69.2% completion rating and where is he now? Brian
Griese also beat out
Favre that year with a rating of 97.5 good enough for 6
th and a 69.3% completion rating. 2005 Brad Johnson, Jake
Delhomme, Mark
Brunell, Kurt Warner, Trent
Dilfer, Kerry Collins, Josh
McCown, Gus
Frerotte, and even Brooks
Bollinger had better ratings than Brett
Favre. List the teams and their playing status now if you can? 2006 the likes of Damon
Huard, JP
Losman, Chad Pennington, Steve
McNair, Jon
Kitna and even Rex
Grossman had better ratings than
Favre.
I wonder if it is not what I am missing, but what the fans are missing?
Favre's time may have come and gone. That is not to take anything away from him, he was a great QB, will go
down in history with all of his records, and yes he will be in the Hall of Fame. But the stats don't lie, the last several years have not been Hall of Fame years, and to average out his last 3-4 years, Brett
Favre is at best an average QB.
All stats are courtesy of NFL.com