So Democrats have gone after Rick Perry for his use of the veto? They claim it is an abuse of power?
Rick Perry tried to get a Democratic Prosecutor to resign after she was arrested for drunk driving. She not only was 3 times the legal limit, she verbally abused the officers, tried to use her power to get out of it and was so disorderly that they had to put her in a spit mask. So why shouldn't she have resigned her position?
He told her that if she didn't resign that he was going to veto funding for the unit that she led. She refused and he did. So tell me again how this is abuse of power?
So in response the Democrats used their position to file felony charges against the Governor for using his veto? That isn't abuse of power?
The Governor is given the authority to use the veto. There is no stipulation on how or when he can veto something. So if the Governor decided to veto the funding for a department or unit that he feels is not managed properly that is all legal. Again, how is that abuse of power?
The Democrats are feeling pretty pleased with themselves over this move. Yet they are very unhappy at the fact that the same type of move could be used on their President. He has overstepped the line in the true meaning on multiple occasions. Yet the same people who would like for Perry to be convicted of using a legal veto find it inconceivable that you would bring charges against the President.
Simply Amazing
No comments:
Post a Comment